Sp. Dukelow et al., Distinguishing subregions of the human MT plus complex using visual fieldsand pursuit eye movements, J NEUROPHYS, 86(4), 2001, pp. 1991-2000
In humans, functional imaging studies have demonstrated a homologue of the
macaque motion complex, MT+ [suggested to contain both middle temporal (MT)
and medial superior temporal (MST)], in the ascending limb of the inferior
temporal sulcus. In the macaque monkey, motion-sensitive areas MT and MST
are adjacent in the superior temporal sulcus. Electrophysiological research
has demonstrated that while MT receptive fields primarily encode the contr
alateral visual field, MST dorsal (MSTd) receptive fields extend well into
the ipsilateral visual field. Additionally, macaque MST has been shown to r
eceive extraretinal smooth-pursuit eye-movement signals, whereas MT does no
t. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the neural prop
erties that had been observed in monkeys to distinguish putative human area
s MT from MST. Optic flow stimuli placed in the full field, or contralatera
l field only, produced a large cluster of functional activation in our subj
ects consistent with previous reports of human area MT+. Ipsilateral optic
flow stimuli limited to the peripheral retina produced activation only in a
n anterior subsection of the MT+ complex, likely corresponding to putative
MSTd. During visual pursuit of a single target, a large portion of the MTcomplex was activated. However, during nonvisual pursuit, only the anterola
teral portion of the MT+ complex was activated. This subsection of the MTcluster could correspond to putative MSTl (lateral). In summary, we observe
d three distinct subregions of the human MT+ complex that were arranged in
a manner similar to that seen in the monkey.