Different responses of masticatory movements after alteration of occlusal guidance related to individual movement pattern

Citation
T. Ogawa et al., Different responses of masticatory movements after alteration of occlusal guidance related to individual movement pattern, J ORAL REH, 28(9), 2001, pp. 830-841
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
0305182X → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
830 - 841
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-182X(200109)28:9<830:DROMMA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
We hypothesized that the motor response of the masticatory system to periph eral inputs varies according to the functional potential of an individual. The specific aim of the present study was to determine whether individually different types of masticatory patterns, especially with respect to the cl osing movement pattern, would produce different motor responses to an alter ation of occlusal guidance. The inclination of the occlusal guidance was st eepened by approximately 10 degrees by attaching a metal overlay to the lin gual surface of the maxillary working-side canine. The masticatory movement s of 20 young adults were measured using a three-dimensional mandibular mov ement analysis system before and after the alteration of occlusal guidance. The individual masticatory patterns were divided into two groups based on the closing movement pattern before the alteration of occlusal guidance, i. e. vertical and lateral types. The alteration of occlusal guidance signific antly influenced the masticatory closing angle, closing time, occlusal time , the stability of the opening angle and the cycle time in the lateral-type group (n = 9, paired t-test; P < 0.05), while no significant changes were found in the vertical-type group (n = 11). These differences in motor respo nse between the two groups were not found in the overall analysis of all th e 20 subjects. We concluded that the oral motor response to the alteration of occlusal guidance depends on the individual masticatory movement pattern . Because the present analysis of subgroups of the subjects revealed motor response findings different from those in the overall analysis of all the 2 0 subjects, such potential subgroupings should be considered as an attempt to identify a specific effect of peripheral inputs on masticatory function in humans.