This paper explores how people process information on low probability-high
consequence negative events and what it will take to get individuals to be
sensitive to the likelihood of these types of accidents or disasters. In a
set of experiments, information is presented to individuals on the likeliho
od of serious accidents from a chemical facility. Comparisons are made with
other risks, such as fatalities from automobile accidents, to see whether
laypersons can determine the relative safety of different plants. We conclu
de that fairly rich context information must be available for people to be
able to judge differences between low probabilities. In particular, it appe
ars that one needs to present comparison scenarios that are located on the
probability scale to evoke people's own feelings of risk. The concept of ev
aluability recently introduced by Hsee and his colleagues provides a useful
explanation of these findings.