Management of lumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Surgical reduct
ion/stabilization is becoming more popular; however. the functional impact
of operative intervention is not clear. The purpose of this study was to as
sess health-related quality of life and functional outcome after posterior
fixation of lumbar burst fractures with either posterolateral or intrabody
bone grafting. Twenty-four subjects were included. Radiographs and computed
tomography scans were evaluated for deformity (kyphosis, vertebral compres
sion, lateral angulation, lateral body height, and canal compromise) postop
eratively, at 1 year, and at final follow-up (mean 3.2 years). Patients com
pleted the SF 36 Health Survey and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Qu
estionnaire at final follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in midsag
ittal diameter compromise, vertebral compression, and kyphosis. The differe
nce observed between the respondents mean scores on the SF 36 was not signi
ficantly different from those presented as the U.S. national average (p = 0
.053). Data from the Oswestry questionnaire indicated a similarly high leve
l of function. Overall, we found posterior spinal instrumentation to correl
ate with positive functional outcome based on both general health (SF 36) a
nd joint-specific outcome scales (Oswestry). Posterior instrumentation prov
ides sound canal decompression, kyphotic reduction, and maintains vertebral
height with minimal transgression and long-term sequelae. In cases of seve
re initial deformity and neurologic compromise, intrabody bone grafting is
most certainly indicated; the additional support provided by a posterolater
al graft may also prove beneficial as an adjunct.