Several automated image background removal schemes for use with line-i
maging Raman spectroscopy are compared. An image of electrodeposited b
eta-CuSCN produced by line-imaging Raman spectroscopy (one spectral di
mension, one spatial dimension) is background-corrected by the adapted
Pearson's method (APM), a Fourier filtering method, and the mathemati
cal morphology method of the rolling cylinder. APM is shown to perform
best overall, but is the most computationally taxing because of the i
terative nature of the algorithm. The effects of the APM parameters ar
e discussed.