Noncontrast harmonic imaging (RI) has been shown to improve image quality i
n adults with poor acoustic windows. The utility of fetal echocardiography
may be limited by suboptimal acoustic windows, and the use of HI in fetal e
chocardiography has not previously been defined. The purpose of this study
was to compare the quality of fundamental imaging (R) and HI in fetal echoc
ardiography. Sixty-two fetal echocardiograms, including 44 (71%) with limit
ed acoustic windows, were performed with the use of FI and M. Image quality
and visualization of the ventricles, valves, and the aortic and ductal arc
hes were evaluated and compared between FI and M. Mean HI scores were highe
r than mean FI scores for all the structures evaluated. Compared with FI, H
I improved the image quality and visualization of cardiac structures in thi
s group of fetuses with predominantly suboptimal acoustic windows. Harmonic
imaging is a useful adjunct to FI in echocardiography, and the benefits of
HI extend to cardiac imaging in the fetus.