Objective: The aim of this study is to report our results with the central
double-orifice technique used for the treatment of complex mitral valve les
ions.
Methods: The central double-orifice repair has been used in 260 patients (m
ean age, 56 +/- 14.3 years) over a period of 7 years. The mechanism respons
ible for mitral regurgitation was prolapse of both leaflets in 148 patients
, prolapse of the anterior leaflet in 68, prolapse of the posterior leaflet
with annular calcification or other unfavorable features in 31, and lack o
f leaflet coaptation for restricted motion or erosion of the free edge in 1
3. Degenerative disease was the cause of mitral regurgitation in 80.8% of t
he patients, rheumatic disease was the cause in 9.6%, endocarditis was the
cause in 6.1%, and ischemic disease was the cause in 2.3%.
Results: Hospital mortality was 0.7%, and the overall survival at 5 years w
as 94.4% +/- 2.59%. Thirteen patients required a reoperation (2 early posto
peratively and 11 late during the follow-up), for an overall freedom from r
eoperation of 90.0% +/- 3.37% at 5 years. Freedom from reoperation was lowe
r in patients with rheumatic valve disease and in patients who did not unde
rgo an annuloplasty procedure.
Conclusions: The effectiveness and durability of the central double-orifice
technique were assessed in this study. This type of repair can be a useful
addition to the surgical armamentarium in mitral valve reconstruction.