The impact of specialists on prescribing by general practitioners

Citation
J. Robertson et al., The impact of specialists on prescribing by general practitioners, MED J AUST, 175(8), 2001, pp. 407-411
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
ISSN journal
0025729X → ACNP
Volume
175
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
407 - 411
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-729X(20011015)175:8<407:TIOSOP>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Objective; To investigate the direct impact of specialists on prescribing b y general practitioners. Design: Cross-sectional, prescription-based study. Subjects and setting: 88 GPs in the Hunter Urban Division of General Practi ce, Hunter Valley, NSW. Main outcome measure: Proportions of specialist-initiated prescriptions for eight commonly prescribed drug classes. Results: The proportion of specialist-initiated prescriptions was greatest for proton pump inhibitors (85%), and lowest for diuretics (8%), newer anti depressants (10%) and H-2-receptor antagonists (13%). Specialists initiated 29% of prescriptions for beta -blockers, 26% for calcium-channel blockers, 20% for statins and 19% for anglotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or an giotensin II antagonists. Specialists were more likely to have been involve d in starting therapy with metoprolol than other P-blockers (51% v 23%) and diltiazem than other calcium-channel blockers (48% v 19%), and this was re lated to indication for treatment. In contrast, prescriptions for the more recently introduced drugs (angiotensin II antagonists and atorvastatin) wer e not more likely to have been specialist-initiated than prescriptions for established angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins. Conclusions: The direct impact of specialists on prescribing in the Hunter Urban Division of General Practice is substantial and varies with the drug class. This highlights the need to engage both GPs and specialists in effor ts to improve prescribing practices.