BACKGROUND: We aimed to find out whether systematic reading of chest radiog
raphy (CRx) by radiologists in the emergency unit might lead to a higher di
agnostic efficiency and improve health care.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: Descriptive study of consecutive admissions during 3 m
onths in an internal medicine department. We registered the CRx interpretat
ion by the emergency unit physician first, and a radiologist the next day.
In cases with different interpretations we assessed whether these differenc
es would have modified the treatment.
RESULTS: The overall disagreement between the emergency room physician and
the radiologist was 13.7%. In 19 of 29 cases with different readings, the r
adiologist interpretation was in agreement with the final diagnosis. In 7 o
f these 19 cases, the radiologist reading of CRx would have led to a positi
ve change of treatment. However, differences between both physicians were n
ot statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be a higher diagnostic efficiency when the emer
gency room physician interpretation of CRx is complemented by a radiologist
.