This paper describes five techniques for estimating vehicle speeds using th
e digital output produced by a 2 m by 1.5 m single inductive loop detector
sampled every 250 ms. The accuracy of each technique was then assessed on t
wo further 2 m by 1.5 m loops fitted in single carriageways and two 2 m by
6.5 m loops spread over two carriageways. One-way ANOVA (Analysis of Varian
ce) tests showed that there were highly significant differences between the
estimation techniques in the mean deviations from the measured speeds over
all four detectors during the peak period (08:00-08:50). Mean absolute per
centage deviations (MAPD) from the measured speeds of between 18.8% and 47.
5% were returned with an overall average of 28.4%. Settling on one techniqu
e, power regression of average loop-occupancy time per vehicle (ALOTPV) dat
a reduced this to 22.7% based on three estimates. The poor results obtained
from detector 3214KI (MAPD of 38.9%), situated immediately downstream from
a signalised pedestrian crossing, indicate that estimation accuracy depend
s crucially on the match between the characteristics of the detector used f
or training and those used for testing. Despite the inaccuracies returned b
y some of the techniques, it was still possible to distinguish free-flow co
nditions and periods of queuing. The importance of estimation accuracy was
not addressed.