Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals

Citation
Le. Molles et Sl. Vehrencamp, Songbird cheaters pay a retaliation cost: evidence for auditory conventional signals, P ROY SOC B, 268(1480), 2001, pp. 2013-2019
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Experimental Biology
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
09628452 → ACNP
Volume
268
Issue
1480
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2013 - 2019
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-8452(20011007)268:1480<2013:SCPARC>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Conventional signals impose costs on senders through receiver retaliation r ather than through investment in signal production. While several visual co nventional signals have been described (mainly 'badges of status'), acousti c examples are rare; however, several aspects of repertoire use in songbird s are potential candidates. We performed interactive playback experiments t o determine whether song-type matches (responding to a song with the same s ong type), repertoire matches (responding to a song with a different song t ype, but one in the repertoires of both singers) and unshared song types se rve as conventional signals during male-male territorial interactions in ba nded wrens, Thryothorus pleurostictus. Our results demonstrate that these t hree signals incite varying levels of receiver aggression: song-type matche s induce faster approach than do repertoire matches, and repertoire matches induce faster approach than do unshared song types. Production costs do no t differ, while the receiver response does. Because territorial banded wren s approach opponents who signal aggressively, such opponents risk attack. T his system will punish and prevent cheaters, as weak males signalling aggre ssion will be subject to escalation by stronger or more-motivated opponents .