Conventional oil-contrast lymphography has long been the mainstay for lymph
atic imaging. However, the emergence of computed tomography (CT) and magnet
ic resonance (MR) imaging has severely curtailed its use. Because of recent
improvements and refinements, lymphangioscintigraphy now permits high-reso
lution imaging of peripheral lymphatic vessels and provides insight into ly
mph flow dynamics. It is indispensable for patients with known or suspected
lymphatic circulatory disorders in confirming the diagnosis and delineatin
g the pathogenesis and evolution of lymphedema. In addition, lymphangioscin
tigraphy helps evaluate lymphatic truncal anatomy and radiotracer transport
. It can also be used to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment options
designed to facilitate lymph flow or reduce lymph formation. The procedure
is essentially noninvasive, can easily be repeated, and does not adversely
affect the lymphatic vascular endothelium. MR imaging complements lymphang
ioscintigraphy in the monitoring and treatment of more complex lymphatic ci
rculatory disorders, whereas CT facilitates catheter-guided percutaneous sc
lerosis or obliteration of specific lymphangiectasia or lymphangioma syndro
mes. Ultrasonography has proved useful in the setting of filariasis. Patien
ts with a provisional diagnosis of peripheral lymphatic dysfunction or idio
pathic edema should undergo diagnostic lymphangioscintigraphy and, in some
cases, MR imaging to verify diagnostic accuracy, pinpoint the specific abno
rmality, and help guide subsequent therapy.