Digital mammography systems allow manipulation of fine differences in image
contrast by means of image processing algorithms. Different display algori
thms have advantages and disadvantages for the specific tasks required in b
reast imaging-diagnosis and screening. Manual intensity windowing can produ
ce digital mammograms very similar to standard screen-film mammograms but i
s limited by its operator dependence. Histogram-based intensity windowing i
mproves the conspicuity of the lesion edge, but there is loss of detail out
side the dense parts of the image. Mixture-model intensity windowing enhanc
es the visibility of lesion borders against the fatty background, but the m
ixed parenchymal densities abutting the lesion may be lost. Contrast-limite
d adaptive histogram equalization can also provide subtle edge information
but might degrade performance in the screening setting by enhancing the vis
ibility of nuisance information. Unsharp masking enhances the sharpness of
the borders of mass lesions, but this algorithm may make even an indistinct
mass appear more circumscribed. Peripheral equalization displays lesion de
tails well and preserves the peripheral information in the surrounding brea
st, but there may be flattening of image contrast in the nonperipheral port
ions of the image. Trex processing allows visualization of both lesion deta
il and breast edge information but reduces image contrast.