Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications

Citation
I. Pedrosa et al., Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications, RADIOGRAPHI, 20(3), 2000, pp. 795-817
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
RADIOGRAPHICS
ISSN journal
02715333 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
795 - 817
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-5333(200005/06)20:3<795:HDRAPF>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Hydatid disease primarily affects the liver and typically demonstrates char acteristic imaging findings. However, there are many potential local compli cations (eg, intrahepatic complications, exophytic growth, transdiaphragmat ic thoracic involvement, perforation into hollow viscera, peritoneal seedin g, biliary communication, portal vein involvement, abdominal wall invasion) . Furthermore, secondary involvement due to hematogenous dissemination may be seen in almost any anatomic location (eg, lung, kidney, spleen, bone, br ain). Ultrasonography (US) is particularly useful for the detection of cyst ic membranes, septa, and hydatid sand. Computed tomography (CT) best demons trates cyst wall calcification and cyst infection. CT and magnetic resonanc e (MR) imaging may demonstrate cyst wall defects as well as the passage of contents through a defect. Chest radiography, US, CT, and MR imaging are al l useful in depicting transdiaphragmatic migration of hydatid disease. CT i s the modality of choice in peritoneal seeding. US and CT demonstrate ruptu re in most cases that involve wide communication. Indirect signs of biliary communication include increased echogenicity at US and fluid levels and si gnal intensity changes at MR imaging. CT allows precise assessment of osseo us lesions, whereas AM imaging is superior in demonstrating neural involvem ent. Familiarity with atypical manifestations of hydatid disease may be hel pful in making a prompt, accurate diagnosis.