M. Shaw et al., Prevalence of herpes simplex type 2 and syphilis serology among young adults in a rural Gambian community, SEX TRANS I, 77(5), 2001, pp. 358-365
Objectives: To estimate prevalence and risk factors for herpes simplex 2 (H
SV2) positivity, syphilis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection among rural p
eople aged 15-34 in the Gambia.
Methods: Questionnaires and serum samples were collected from 1076 men and
women aged 15-34 during a cross sectional prevalence survey in a rural area
of the Gambia. Sera were screened for antibodies to herpes simplex virus t
ype 2 (HSV2), and for syphilis using Treponema pallidum haemagglutination a
ssay (TPHA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests. Urine was tested by polyme
rase chain reaction (PCR) for C trachomatis infection.
Results: 28% of women and 5% of men were HSV2 ELISA positive; 10% of women
and 2% of men were TPHA positive; and 7% of women and 1% of men were both R
PR and TPHA positive. Out of 1030 urine sample tested only six were positiv
e for C trachomatis. 7% of those who reported never having sex were positiv
e for one or other of these tests. Prevalences of all STIs increased with a
ge and were higher in women than men. Women were much less likely than men
to seek treatment for STI symptoms at a health centre. Married people were
at increased risk of an STI compared with single people. Jola and Fula wome
n had a higher prevalence of HSV2 than women from other ethnic groups, and
Fulas also had a higher prevalence of RPR/TPHA positivity. The limited numb
er of sexual behaviour questions were not significantly associated with STI
s after adjustment for age, marital status, and ethnic group.
Conclusions: The prevalences of the ulcerative infections HSV2 and syphilis
in this population are a cause for concern. In a setting where HIV I preva
lence remains low this indicates an urgent need for STI control and behavio
ur change programmes to prevent an HIV epidemic. Concerns about the validit
y of reported sexual behaviour data high light the necessity of biological
markers in the evaluation of behaviour change programmes.