Background and Purpose-Based on the results of animal experiments, clinical
trials were performed with nimodipine, which did not demonstrate a benefic
ial effect on outcome after stroke. The aim of this study was to determine
whether the evidence from animal experiments with nimodipine supported the
use of nimodipine in clinical trials.
Methods-We performed a systematic review of animal experiments with nimodip
ine in focal cerebral ischemia. Studies were identified by searching Medlin
e and Embase. We assessed whether these studies showed a beneficial effect
of active treatment. In-depth analyses were performed on infarct size and a
mount of edema, and subgroup analyses were performed on the length of the t
ime window to the initiation of treatment and the methodological quality of
the studies.
Results-Of 225 identified articles, 20 studies were included. The methodolo
gical quality of the studies was poor. Of the included studies, 50% were in
favor of nimodipine. In-depth analyses showed statistically significant ef
fects in favor of treatment (10 studies). No influence of the length of tim
e to the initiation of treatment or of the methodological quality on the re
sults was found.
Conclusions-We conclude that the results of this review did not show convin
cing evidence to substantiate the decision to perform trials with nimodipin
e in large numbers of patients. There were no differences between the resul
ts of the animal experiments and clinical studies. Surprisingly, we found t
hat animal experiments and clinical studies ran simultaneously.