Visualisation of human plasma fibrinogen adsorbed on titanium implant surfaces with different roughness

Citation
P. Cacciafesta et al., Visualisation of human plasma fibrinogen adsorbed on titanium implant surfaces with different roughness, SURF SCI, 491(3), 2001, pp. 405-420
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
SURFACE SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00396028 → ACNP
Volume
491
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
405 - 420
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6028(20011001)491:3<405:VOHPFA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Direct visualisation of adsorbed human plasma proteins on biomaterial surfa ces may help the understanding of the performance of implants, The aim of t his study was the visualisation of human plasma fibrinogen (HPF) adsorbed o n different titanium implants with characterised surface properties. Seven types of titanium samples were used: mechanically polished (P); mechanicall y ground (G); sand blasted with alumina (B); sand blasted with alumina and etched in HF/HNO3 (BN); sand blasted with alumina and etched in HCl/H2SO4 ( SLA); mechanically polished and etched in HCl/H2SO4 (PSLA); and plasma spra yed (TPS). The surface morphology and roughness of these surfaces were anal ysed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), The surface chemical composition of the implants was analysed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and tim e of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). The seven processin g methods influenced the roughness and produced distinct morphologies of th e implant surfaces, The main chemical constituent of all surfaces was TiO2, with some samples showing the presence of other elements. HPF adsorbed on the titanium surfaces was visualised by AFM phase imaging. Visualisation of the adsorbed HPF was successfully achieved on samples P and G, but not on the other five samples. Differences in the dimensions and in the phase cont rast of HPF molecules adsorbed on P and G surfaces were observed and discus sed. No correlation between surface topography and morphology of the adsorb ed proteins was observed on surfaces P and G. Possible reasons for not dete cting HPF with AFM on five of the seven sample types were attributed to the surface physico-chemical properties of these samples. (C) 2001 Elsevier Sc ience B.V. All rights reserved.