Background: The rapid adoption of laparoscopic surgery since the late 1980s
added tremendous complexity into the operating room (OR) environment. For
each case, a plethora of additional equipment-including monitors, video equ
ipment, wiring, tubing, and cords-had to be set up, prolonging OR turnover
time and decreasing OR efficiency. In 1993, the concept of designated minim
ally invasive surgery (MIS) suites was introduced. MIS suites integrated mo
nitors and video equipment into the OR on ceiling-mounted columns and moved
the controls to a centralized nursing station. The overall effect of this
innovation on OR efficiency has not been measured.
Methods: Five RNs with varying degrees of MIS experience were instructed on
video setup and put-away criteria and then timed while performing, a set o
f standardized tasks. Each set of tasks was performed twice using a standar
dized surgery model. Differences in setup and put-away times between MIS su
ites and standard ORs were tested using the t-test for paired comparisons.
Results: The mean standard deviation (SD) video setup times were 27.9 +/- 5
.3 see (MIS) and 254.3 +/- 54.0 see (standard); the put-away times were 19.
8 +/- 2.7 see (MIS) and 222.3 +/- 26.0 see (standard). The mean difference
standard error (SE) in both the setup (226.4 +/- 16.9 see, p = 0.0001) and
put-away times (202.5 +/- 8.6, p = 0.0001) were large and statistically sig
nificant.
Conclusion: Using a simulation model, we have demonstrated that the use of
a MIS suite reduces video setup and put-away time significantly, with the p
otential for significant associated cost savings. This provides just one ju
stification for the high cost of building such "ORs of the future."