We have revisited the problem of propagation of toroidal and linear Al
fven waves formulated by Heinemann and Olbert (1980) to compare WKB an
d non-WKB waves and their effects on the solar wind. They considered t
wo solar wind models and showed that reflection is important for Alfve
n waves with periods of the order of one day and longer and that non-W
KB Alfven waves are no more effective in accelerating the solar wind t
han WKB waves. There are several recently published papers that seem t
o indicate that Alfven waves with periods of the order of several minu
tes should be treated as non-WKB waves and that these non-WKB waves ex
ert a stronger acceleration force than WKB waves. The purpose of this
paper is to study the origin of these discrepancies by performing para
metric studies of the behavior of the waves under a variety of differe
nt conditions. In addition, we want to investigate two problems that h
ave not been addressed by Heinemann and Olbert, namely, calculate the
efficiency of Alfven wave reflection by using the reflection coefficie
nt and identify the region of strongest wave reflection in different w
ind models. To achieve these goals, we investigated the influence of t
emperature, electron density distribution, wind velocity, and magnetic
field strength on the waves. The obtained results clearly demonstrate
that Alfven wave reflection is strongly model dependent and that the
strongest reflection can be expected in models with the base temperatu
res higher than 10(6) K and with the base densities lower than 7 x 10(
7) cm(-3). Ln these models as well as in the models with lower tempera
tures and higher densities, Alfven waves with periods as short as seve
ral minutes have negligible reflection so that they can be treated as
WKB waves; however, for Alfven waves with periods of the order of one
hour or longer reflection is significant, requiring a non-WKB treatmen
t. We also show that non-WKB, Linear Alfven waves are always less effe
ctive in accelerating the plasma than WKB Alfven waves. Finally, it is
evident from our results that the region of strongest wave reflection
is usually located at the base of the models and hence that interpret
ation of wave reflection based solely on the reflection coefficient ca
n be misleading.