Protective effects of amifostine and its analogues on sulfur mustard toxicity in vitro and in vivo

Citation
R. Bhattacharya et al., Protective effects of amifostine and its analogues on sulfur mustard toxicity in vitro and in vivo, TOX APPL PH, 176(1), 2001, pp. 24-33
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
0041008X → ACNP
Volume
176
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
24 - 33
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-008X(20011001)176:1<24:PEOAAI>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Sulfur mustard (bis(2-chloroethyl)sulfide, SM) is a highly reactive bifunct ional alkylating agent that forms sulfonium ions in the body. SM alkylates DNA, leading to DNA strand breaks and cell death in a variety of cell types and tissues. Although several approaches have been proposed to challenge t he toxic action(s) of SM, no satisfactory treatment regimen has evolved. Th e synthetic aminothiol amifostine, earlier known as WR-2721 (S-2-(3-amino-p ropylamino)ethyl phosphorothioate), has been extensively used as a chemical radioprotector for the normal tissues in cancer radiotherapy and chemother apy. SM is known as a radiomimetic agent and this prompted us to evaluate t he protective efficacy of amifostine (2.5 mM) and three of its analogues, D RDE-06 (S-2 (3-aminopropylamino) ethyl phenyl sulfide), DRDE-07 (S-2 (2-ami noethylamino) ethyl phenyl sulfide), and DRDE-08 (S-2 (4-aminobutylamino) e thyl phenyl sulfide), against SM toxicity in rat liver slices. Of the four agents tested, a 30-min pretreatment of amifostine and DRDE-07 enhanced the LC50 (a concentration producing 50% leakage of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) of SM by 5.9- and 3.3-fold for LDH and 10.2- and 5.5-fold for ALT, respectively. Except DNA fragmentation, both th ese agents significantly attenuated the loss of intracellular K+ and mitoch ondrial integrity (MTT assay), depletion of GSH levels, and histopathology produced by a toxic concentration (80 muM) of SM. However, when amifostine and DRDE-07 were introduced 2 h after SM, no significant protection was obs erved. SM (77.5 or 155 mg/kg) was also applied dermally on female albino mi ce and challenged by 0.20 LD50 (po) of amifostine, DRDE-06, DRDE-07, or DRD E-08 at -30 min, 0 min, or +6 h. Protection was observed only when the agen ts were administered at -30 min or 0 min; posttreatment (+6 h) did not offe r any protection. The magnitude of in vivo protection was in the following order: DRDE-07 greater than or equal to amifostine > DRDE-08 > DRDE-06. Gas chromatographic analysis showed that there was no direct chemical interact ion between SM and the antidotes. The po LD50s of amifostine, DRDE-06, DRDE -07, and DRDE-08 were 1049,1345, 1248, and 951 mg/kg, respectively. Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate promising roles of amifostine and DRDE-07 as prophylactic agents against SM poisoning. (C) 2001 Academic Press.