Em. O'Neill et al., Autologous platelet-rich plasma isolated using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5 and Haemonetics MCS+ for the preparation of platelet gel, VOX SANGUIN, 81(3), 2001, pp. 172-175
Background and Objectives We compared three methods of isolating platelet-r
ich plasma (PRP) using the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5 and one method of isola
ting PRP by plateletpheresis using the Haemonetics MCS+. PRP contains both
platelets and fibrinogen, which are used in the preparation of haemostatic
agents.
Materials and Methods When the Haemonetics Cell Saver 5 was used, 500 ml of
blood from each of 30 normal volunteer donors was collected into 70 ml of
citrate-phosphate-dextrose (CPD) anticoagulant. In a further 14 normal volu
nteers, the Haemonetics MCS+ was used to isolate PRP by plateletpheresis us
ing an acid citrate dextrose (ACD) to blood ratio of 1 : 9. In a separate s
tudy, CPD-anticoagulated whole blood from another 30 volunteers was used fo
r measurement of fibrinogen levels in the plasma and cryoprecipitate.
Results, A larger volume of PRP can be collected using the Haemonetics Cell
.Saver 5 than by using the Haemonetics MCS+. The platelet concentration and
the total number of platelets were higher in the PRP isolated using the Ha
emonetics MCS+ than in the PRP isolated by the three methods used with the
Haemonetics Cell Saver 5, with differences in platelet concentration and PR
P volume among the four methods. The mean fibrinogen level in the plasma wa
s 253 mg % +/- 47 (SD) and in the, cryoprecipitate, was 1085 mg O% +/- 304
(SD).
Conclusions The, most appropriate method of PRP isolation for preparation o
f platelet gel is dependent upon the specific surgical procedure to be unde
rtaken and the patient's needs.