Heart Rate Variability (HRV) reflects the response of the heart to a variet
y of influences and provides informations about sympathetic and parasympath
etic influences affecting the cardiovascular system in the perioperative pe
riod. However, because of the complexity of the autonomic control of the ca
rdiovascular system the interpretation of HRV measurements needs caution. T
he knowledge of the pathophysiology underlying HRV is critical in order to
understand the state of the autonomic nervous system and its relevance for
patient management. HRV seems to be a useful tool for preoperative cardiova
scular risk stratification. Confounding effects of multiple factors influen
cing HRV in the perioperative setting limit this methodology for example as
a depth-of-anaesthesia monitor.
Lack of standardization renders the comparison of results of different inve
stigations difficult. Of major concern in this context is the quality of th
e electrocardiogram recording when assessing HRV. Because of the ongoing pr
ogress in monitoring with regard to acquisition and computer-based analysis
of HRV data it seems at least possible to measure HRV routinely in the per
ioperative setting. However, large prospective and standardized trials are
necessary. Depending on the results the clinical relevance of HRV as a rela
tively simple and noninvasive perioperative monitoring should be reevaluate
d.