Lg. Arlian et al., Distribution and removal of cat, dog and mite allergens on smooth surfacesin homes with and without pets, ANN ALLER A, 87(4), 2001, pp. 296-302
Background: Removing allergen from the indoor environment should be a prima
ry strategy for the management and treatment of allergic disease.
Objective: The aims of this study were to characterize the distribution of
dog, cat, and mite allergen on hard surfaces in homes with and without pets
and to evaluate the efficiency of removing allergen from hard surfaces by
wiping with a dry dust cloth and by vacuum cleaning using the dustbrush att
achment.
Methods: The amount of allergen collected from adjacent areas of two smooth
floors, a wall, and finished furniture by wiping with a Pledge Grab-it dus
t cloth (S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc, Racine, WI) and by brush-vacuuming were
compared for 24 homes with and without pets. In addition, the areas first w
iped with the dust cloth were then brush-vacuumed and the amounts of allerg
en collected by the first and second cleaning were compared.
Results: A key Ending was that 23 of the 24 homes had Can f 1 allergen on o
ne or more of the sampled areas regardless of whether a dog was present. Mo
st homes with pets and many homes without pets had Can f 1 and Fel d 1 alle
rgens on walls, smooth floors, and finished furniture. Carpets were the maj
or reservoir for pet allergens in homes with pets whereas allergen was more
uniformly distributed in homes without pets. Little mite allergen was foun
d on hard surfaces even when it was present in carpets.
Conclusions: Dog and cat allergens are prevalent on walls, smooth floors, a
nd finished furniture in homes with and without pets. Dry dusting with a Gr
ab-it dust cloth was an effective cleaning method for removing allergen fro
m hard smooth surfaces.