Oral liarozole in the treatment of palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Citation
M. Bhushan et al., Oral liarozole in the treatment of palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, BR J DERM, 145(4), 2001, pp. 546-553
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology,"da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00070963 → ACNP
Volume
145
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
546 - 553
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(200110)145:4<546:OLITTO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPP) is a chronic, relapsing co ndition often recalcitrant to therapy. Synthetic retinoids have been found to be efficacious in the treatment of PPP but their use is limited by side- effects. Liarozole is an imidazole-like compound that inhibits the retinoic acid (RA) 4-hydroxylase-mediated breakdown of all-trans RA, causing elevat ion of plasma and cutaneous levels of RA. Thus liarozole acts as a retinoid -mimetic drug. Liarozole has already been found to be effective in the trea tment of retinoid-responsive conditions such as chronic plaque psoriasis an d ichthyoses. Objectives To assess the efficacy and side-effect profile of liarozole in t he treatment of PPP Methods We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial o f oral liarozole 75 mg twice daily for 12 weeks in the treatment of PPP The trial was conducted at two centres and involved 15 patients. Results Using the PPP Area and Severity Index we found a statistically sign ificant (P = 0.02) improvement in PPP in subjects on liarozole (median 3, r ange 1.8-14.1) as compared with placebo (median 12.1, range 5-18) by the en d of the treatment phase. There was also a statistically significant differ ence (P = 0.006) in the number of fresh pustules after treatment for the tw o study groups (liarozole median 2, range 0-18: placebo median 38, range 2- 75). The severity of disease (on a scale of 0-8) between the two groups was significantly different at the end of treatment (liarozole median 1, range 1-5: placebo median 3, range 2-6: P = 0.04). No patients withdrew from the trial because of adverse events. The most commonly reported side-effects w ere pruritus, cheilitis and xerosis but these were rarely severe and resolv ed rapidly on discontinuation of treatment. Laboratory results, including h aematology, liver function tests and serum cholesterol and triglycerides we re not significantly different between the liarozole and placebo groups. Conclusions The results of this pilot study suggest that liarozole 75 mg tw ice daily is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for PPP In addition, t he pharmacokinetics of liarozole may help to circumvent side-effects associ ated with synthetic retinoids and allow its use in premenopausal women.