Purpose: State variation in inclusion of ancillary services in daily Medica
id nursing home reimbursement rates, versus covering ancillary costs outsid
e of such rates, makes rate comparisons difficult, The purpose of this stud
y is to adjust for inclusion of ancillaries when comparing Medicaid rates a
cross states. Design and Methods: Data for 1987-1998 were drawn from a nati
onal survey of Medicaid reimbursement. Employing a random-effects model, th
e PANEL option in the LIMDEP software was used to estimate effects on state
average Medicaid nursing facility constant-dollar rates of the inclusion i
n those rates of a set of ancillaries: physical therapy, occupational thera
py, prescription drugs, nonprescription drugs, durable medical equipment (D
ME), medical supplies, and physician services. Results: Rates averaged high
er when they included occupational therapy, physician services, nonprescrip
tion drugs, and both DME and medical supplies. Adjusting for the inclusion
of ancillaries leads to a much different ranking of states than for unadjus
ted rates. Implications: Public and industry policy makers should consider
the inclusion of ancillaries in rates when considering the relative adequac
y of rates across states.