What do physicians think about evidence-based antibiotic use in critical care? A survey of Australian intensivists and infectious disease practitioners
V. Sintchenko et al., What do physicians think about evidence-based antibiotic use in critical care? A survey of Australian intensivists and infectious disease practitioners, INTERN M J, 31(8), 2001, pp. 462-469
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The analysis of factors that influence prescribing decisions is
increasingly important. Antibiotic use is often based on limited evidence
and lack of information about clinical decision-making processes is an impo
rtant obstacle to improving antibiotic utilization.
Aims: To compare the attitudes of intensive care unit practitioners (ICUP)
and infectious disease practitioners (IDP) to antibiotic use and to the evi
dence- based information support.
Method: A postal survey conducted between March and July 2000 of ICUP and I
DP representing all States and Territories in Australia.
Results: One hundred and fifty-three of 224 clinicians returned the questio
nnaire (68.3% response rate). In choosing an antibiotic, IDP placed signifi
cantly more weight than ICUP on the in vitro susceptibility of the pathogen
(P = 0.001), antibiotic cost (P = 0.05) and possible development of antibi
otic resistance (P = 0.007). More than 95% of both groups believed that uni
t-specific antibiotic susceptibility of endemic pathogens was an essential
factor in rational prescribing, but only 68.5% of IDP and 38.7% of ICUP use
microbiology laboratory databases. When in doubt about appropriate antibio
tic use, 63.8% of ICUP seek and 76.3% usually follow the advice of IDP. Bot
h groups agree that published antibiotic guidelines are useful, but IDP wer
e more likely to consult them. ICUP were more likely to believe that guidel
ines are used to control clinicians rather than to improve quality of care
(P = 0.001). A greater proportion of IDP (71.2%) than ICUP (52.5%) believed
that antibiotic prescribing in their intensive care unit (ICU) was evidenc
e based but most (91.8% and 86.9%, respectively) agreed that it should be.
Conclusions: Australian clinicians have positive views about evidence-based
prescribing and antibiotic guidelines. However, there are clinically signi
ficant differences in prescribing behaviour between ICUP and IDP. These may
be explained by different disease spectra managed by each group or differe
nt cultures, training and/or cognitive styles. Improvements in the understa
nding of physicians' information and decision support needs are required to
strengthen evidence-based prescribing.