Potassium-based dilutional method to measure hemodialysis access recirculation

Citation
D. Brancaccio et al., Potassium-based dilutional method to measure hemodialysis access recirculation, INT J ARTIF, 24(9), 2001, pp. 606-613
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
ISSN journal
03913988 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
606 - 613
Database
ISI
SICI code
0391-3988(200109)24:9<606:PDMTMH>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background: Assessment of access recirculation (AR) is crucial to dialysis efficiency and there is thus a need for a method yielding a highly accurate , fast, easy and economical measurement that can be applied in any busy dia lysis clinic. Non-urea based dilutional methods are more accurate than urea based methods and avoid problems with cardiopulmonary recirculation, but t hey require expensive specialized devices, which limit their applicability. Methods: We developed a simple dilutional method of AR which does not requi re any specific device, based on the determination of serum potassium [K+] in two samples. Briefly, a basal sample is drawn at the time of needle inse rtion (basal (K+)); needles are connected to blood lines and blood flow rat e is quickly increased to 300 ml/mm; a second sample (arterial (K+)) is dra wn from the arterial line port within 5 to 10 seconds, to avoid errors due to cardiopulmonary recirculation of the normal saline entering the blood st ream. At this time, if recirculation is present, part of the normal saline will enter the arterial line and dilute the serum [K+]. The AR formula is: AR (%) - 100 x [1 - arterial K+/basal K+] We compared our method with the two-needle urea and ultrasound velocity dil ution methods. Results: AR values by the ultrasound method > 10% were hypothesized as gold standard for AR, against which values obtained with the potassium method w ere compared. The potassium based method showed: sensitivity (100%,); speci ficity (95%); predictive value, positive (91%); predictive value, negative (100%). In addition, the potassium based method appears to be more reliable than the two-needle urea based method. Conclusion: Our method, similar to other dilutional methods, is not influen ced by cardiopulmonary recirculation or veno-venous disequilibrium and is f ast and accurate. Moreover it is very simple, economical, and can easily be performed in any dialysis unit.