Ji. Smedberg et al., Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: Prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study, INT J O M I, 16(5), 2001, pp. 668-674
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
The aim of this 3-year prospective study was to evaluate the prosthetic tre
atment in 2 groups of maxillary edentulous patients with similar age and ge
nder distribution: a study group of 39 patients treated with intra-sinus bl
ock bone grafts and implants in a 1-stage procedure, and a control (referen
ce) group of 37 patients treated with implants and no grafting. In the stud
y group, bone volumes were regarded as insufficient for implant treatment u
nless a bone grafting procedure was performed (posterior alveolar bone heig
ht was less than 5 mm). Self-tapping Nobel Biocare implants were used in bo
th groups of patients. In the study group, 35 fixed partial dentures and 4
overdentures were placed, and in the control group 34 fixed partial denture
s and 3 overdentures were placed. All patients were followed for at least 3
years. The 3-year follow-up examination included examination of a number o
f clinical parameters as well as the type of abutment and evaluation of sta
bility of prosthesis retention screws and abutment screws. During the follo
w-up period, 2 patients were lost from the study group and 4 patients from
the control group, giving a total of 70 patients available for examination
after 3 years (8% dropout rate). Both the amount of plaque and gingival ble
eding were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group
. The presence of attached gingiva was 25% in the study group and 35% in th
e control group. The number of angulated abutments was significantly higher
in the study group than in the control group. There was no significant dif
ference in the number of prosthetic complications in the 2 groups of patien
ts. Neither was there any significant difference in prosthesis screw or abu
tment screw stability between the 2 groups. The type of abutment did not si
gnificantly influence the stability of prosthesis retention screws or abutm
ent screws in either of the groups. However, prosthesis screw stability was
significantly greater than abutment screw stability in both groups of pati
ents. It can be concluded that the prosthetic outcome was similar in the 2
groups of patients, regardless of whether or not a bone grafting procedure
was used.