Ms. Biring et al., Use of forced inspiratory vital capacity to identify bronchodilator reversibility in obstructive lung disease, J ASTHMA, 38(6), 2001, pp. 495-500
The objective of this study was to assess the utility of forced inspiratory
vital capacity, (FIVC) to identify, bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) for
patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD) in relation to customary BDR
criteria as defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS). Concurrent data
analysis was used in an academic medical center setting. Two hundred patie
nts with OLD (including chronic obstructive lung disease and asthma) underg
oing testing at the Pulmonary Function Laboratory at Cedars-Sinai Medical C
enter from January 1995 to December 1996 were identified. These 200 patient
s were categorized into four grades of obstruction by ATS-defined forced ex
piratory volume in I see (FEV1) criteria (severe, moderately severe, modera
te, and mild). Each of these groups was further subdivided into equal subgr
oups according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of BDR. Inspiratory flow-
volume loops and FIVC were analyzed for each of these subgroups. Of the pat
ients exhibiting BDR on the forced expiratory, maneuver (FEM), FIVC correct
ly identified 53% of the cases. For patients not exhibiting BDR on FEM, FIV
C identified an additional 12 cases. In 72% of cases, the maximal FIVC was
not obtained from the maximal FEM flow-volume loop. FIVC inspection of the
data (which were already available from standard spirometric testing) ident
ified a subgroup of OLD patients with BDR not appreciated by FEV1 or FVC cr
iteria, which may respond to bronchodilator therapy. The maximal FIVC value
should be obtained by manual inspection to identify the best inspiratory f
low-volume loop.