This review examines how birds use the annual cycle in photoperiod to ensur
e that seasonal events-breeding, molt, and song production-happen at the ap
propriate time of year. Differences in breeding strategies between birds an
d mammals reflect basic differences in biology. Avian breeding seasons tend
to be of shorter duration and more asymmetric with respect to changes in p
hotoperiod. Breeding seasons can occur at the same time each year (predicta
ble) or at different times (opportunistic), depending on the food resource.
In all cases, there is evidence for involvement of photoperiodic control,
nonphotoperiodic control, and endogenous circannual rhythmicity. In predict
able breeders (most nontropical species), photoperiod is the predominant pr
oximate factor. Increasing photoperiods of spring stimulate secretion of go
nadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and consequent gonadal maturation. Howe
ver, breeding ends before the return of short photoperiods. This is the con
sequence of a second effect of long photoperiods-the induction of photorefr
actoriness. This dual role of long photoperiods is required to impart the a
symmetry in breeding seasons. Typically, gonadal regression through photore
fractoriness is associated with a massive decrease in hypothalamic GnRH, es
sentially a reversal to a pre-pubertal condition. Although breeding seasons
are primarily determined by photoperiodic control of GnRH neurons, prolact
in may be important in determining the exact timing of gonadal regression.
In tropical and opportunistic breeders, endogenous circannual rhythmicity m
ay be more important. In such species, the reproductive system remains in a
state of "readiness to breed" for a large part of the year, with nonphotic
cues acting as proximate cues to time breeding. Circannual rhythmicity may
result from a temporal sequence of different physiological states rather t
han a molecular or cellular mechanism as in circadian rhythmicity. Avian ho
mologues of mammalian clock genes Per2, Per3, Clock, bmal1, and MON have be
en cloned. At the molecular level, avian circadian clocks appear to functio
n in a similar manner to those of mammals. Photoperiodic time measurement i
nvolves interaction between a circadian rhythm of photoinducibility and, un
like mammals, deep brain photoreceptors. The exact location of these remain
s unclear. Although the eyes and pineal generate a daily cycle in melatonin
, this photoperiodic signal is not used to time seasonal breeding. Instead,
photoperiodic responses appear to involve direct interaction between photo
receptors and GnRH neurons. Thyroid hormones are required in some way for t
his system to function. In addition to gonadal function, song production is
also affected by photoperiod. Several of the nuclei involved in the song s
ystem show seasonal changes in volume, greater in spring than in the fall.
The increase in volume is, in part, due to an increase in cell number as a
result of neurogenesis. There is no seasonal change in the birth of neurons
but rather in their survival. Testosterone and melatonin appear to work an
tagonistically in regulating volume.