Bd. Spiess et al., Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: Evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device, J CARDIOTHO, 15(5), 2001, pp. 567-573
Objective: To compare a second-generation thoracic electrical bioimpedance
(TEB) hemodynamic monitoring system with the clinically used pulmonary arte
ry catheter thermodilution (TD-PAC) system.
Design: Blinded, simultaneous measurements at specified key time points dur
ing surgery.
Setting: University teaching hospital cardiac surgical operating rooms.
Participants: Forty-seven patients undergoing primary elective coronary art
ery bypass surgery. Interventions: Timed cardiac output measurements by the
rmodilution and continuous monitoring of bioimpedance were performed.
Measurements and Main Results: Cardiac index (TEB and TD-PAC) and other hem
odynamic parameters were measured at 4 time points: (1) after anesthesia in
duction, (2) with the mediastinum open, (3) immediately after cardiopulmona
ry bypass, and (4) at the end of the case. Pearson's correlation and Bland-
Altman analysis were carried out. Cardiac index by TEB and TD-PAC had an ov
erall correlation of r = 0.71 (p < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman statistics sho
wed a mean difference of -0.28 L/min/m(2) and precision of 0.67 L/min/m2. T
he best correlation was at time 1, and the lowest correlation was at time 4
. Mediastinal opening and cardiopulmonary bypass had little or no effect on
the correlation between technologies.
Conclusion: TEB reporting of cardiac index during coronary artery surgery g
enerally agreed with TD-PAC cardiac index except at the end of the case (ti
me 4). Copyright (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.