M. Grunewald et al., DOUBLE-BOLUS VERSUS SINGLE-BOLUS THROMBOLYSIS WITH RETEPLASE FOR ACUTE-MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC STUDY, Fibrinolysis & proteolysis, 11(3), 1997, pp. 137-145
Reteplase, a K2P deletion mutant of tissue plasminogen activator, is a
novel recombinant thrombolytic agent, designed primarily for bolus th
rombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. To avoid early reocclusion,
which had been substantial after single-bolus therapy, the concept of
double-bolus thrombolysis was developed and evaluated in recently pub
lished clinical trials. In this study, the pharmacokinetic profiles of
double-bolus thrombolysis with 10 + 10 or 10 + 5 units (U) of retepla
se at 30 min intervals were compared to that of a single 15 U bolus an
d the relative impacts on the hemostatic system were investigated. By
splitting the dose of 15 U of reteplase in boluses of 10 + 5 U, median
plasma antigen and activity levels above 700 ng/ml and 250 aU/ml (act
ivity units) were prolonged by 1.5 min; all other pharmacokinetic prop
erties and the pharmacodynamic variables investigated were similar in
the 15 and 10 + 5 U groups. By doubling the dose of the second bolus t
o 10 U, a further prolongation of 45 min and 35 min was observed; medi
an reteplase activity peaks were distinctly higher than relative antig
en peaks after the second 10 U bolus, probably indicating that residua
l inhibitory activity against the plasminogen activator was overcome b
y the high activator dose, corresponding well with the higher patency
rates found for this dosage in earlier clinical studies. In the 10 + 1
0 U group, more distinct alterations in hemostatic variables were obse
rved, with increased fibrinogen consumption and split-product producti
on resulting in a more pronounced fibrinolytic state. In accordance wi
th previous studies, we found plasma alpha- and beta-half-lives of ret
eplase to be 4 and 19 times longer than those of alteplase, No deaths,
strokes, major bleedings or overt allergic reactions were observed. A
s an important limitation of our study, it has to be stated that our o
wn clinical findings, particularly the patency rates, disharmonize wit
h expected results and results from larger trials investigating clinic
al end-points. Reasons for this could have included the small sample s
ize of our study, relatively long times to treatment and an increased
degree of thrombin activation prior to thrombolysis in the groups with
low patency rates.