Movements and home range dynamics of cottontail rabbits in Mississippi

Citation
Bt. Bond et al., Movements and home range dynamics of cottontail rabbits in Mississippi, J WILDL MAN, 65(4), 2001, pp. 1004-1013
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0022541X → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1004 - 1013
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-541X(200110)65:4<1004:MAHRDO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Knowledge of movement rates with respect to habitat conditions is necessary to understand foraging strategies, breeding opportunities, and probability of predation. The cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) is an important small game animal, yet no previous study has simultaneously examined movement ra tes and home range dynamics with respect to gender, breeding season, diel p eriod, and habitat use. We estimated home range (HR) and core use areas (CA ) during the breeding seasons and diel periods for 94 cottontails. We deter mined breeding season, diel period, and habitat-specific movement rates for 103 cottontails in east-central Mississippi from 1 February 1997 to 31 Jan uary 1999. Overall movement rates (m/hr) did not differ between years (1997 : (x) over bar = 28.81 m/hr, SE = 1.67; 1998: (x) over bar = 26.26 m/hr. SE = 2.34) or genders (male: (x) over bar 28.81 m/hr, SE = 2.24: female: (x) over bar = 23.06 m/hr, SE = 1.49). However, diel period interacted with sea son to influence movements (diurnal breeding: (x) over bar = 8.99 m/hr, SE = 0.93; diurnal nonbreeding: (x) over bar = 3.23 m/hr, SE = 0.35; crepuscul ar breeding: (x) over bar = 33.40 m/hr, SE = 2.47 crepuscular nonbreeding: (x) over bar = 23.45 m/hr. SE = 1.90; nocturnal breeding: (x) over bar = 43 .12 m/hr, SE = 3.27; nocturnal nonbreeding: (x) over bar = 29.12 m/hr, SE = 1.71). Movement rates differed among habitat types (>1 habitat patch: (x) over bar = 41.7 m/hr, SE = 2.3; open fields: (x) over bar = 35.5 m/hr, SE = 6.1; rowcrops: (x) over bar 25.5 m/hr, SE 3.1; grass fields: (x) over bar = 19.4 m/hr, SE = 0.9; woody areas: (x) over bar = 15.7 m/hr, SE = 1.7). Th ese differences were associated with differences in plant species richness (woody areas: (x) over bar = 11.1 plant species/30 m, SE = 0.7 : grass fiel ds: (x) over bar = 9.2 plant species/30 m, SE = 0.3: open areas: (x) over b ar8.5 plant species/30 m, SE = 1.1; rowcrops: (x) over bar = 5.8 plant spec ies/30 m, SE = 1. 1) and percentage cover within habitats (0.0-0.9 in in he ight: rowcrop, woody areas, and grass fields had significantly greater cove r than open areas; 0.9-1.8 m in height: rowcrop and woody areas had greater cover than grass fields and open areas). A significant gender-by-season in teraction occurred for HR (95% adaptive. kernel) (male breeding: (x) over b ar = 5.98 ha. SE = 0.57; male nonbreeding: (x) over bar = 2.54 ha, SE = 0.6 5; female breeding: (x) over bar = 3.04 ha, SE = 0.33 female nonbreeding: ( x) over bar 2.11 ha, SE = 0.51) and CA (50%) (male breeding: (x) over bar = 0.93 ha, SE = 0.10; male nonbreeding: (x) over bar = 0.32 ha, SE = 0.08; f emale breeding: (x) over bar = 0.41 ha, SE 0.05; female nonbreeding: (x) ov er bar = 0.26 ha, SE = 0.05). Home range (diurnal: (x) over bar = 3.71 ha, SE=0.47: nocturnal /crepuscular: (x) over bar = 4.70 ha, SE = 0.43) and CA (diurnal: (x) over bar = 0.52 ha, SE = 0.07; nocturnal/crepuscular: (x) ove r bar = 0.69 ha, SE = 0.06) size differed between diel periods. Habitat spe cific movement patterns may be a function of forage availability and may in fluence fitness, particularly predation risk. Selection of habitats or habi tat conditions that result in reduced movement rates by cottontails should reduce vulnerability to predation.