Background Whether antihypertensive drugs offer cardiovascular protection b
eyond blood pressure lowering has not been established. We aimed to investi
gate whether pharmacological properties of anti hypertensive drugs or reduc
tion of systolic pressure accounted for cardiovascular outcome in hypertens
ive or high-risk patients.
Methods In a meta-analysis we extracted summary statistics from published r
eports, and calculated pooled odds ratios for experimental versus reference
treatment. We correlated across-trials odd ratios for differences in systo
lic pressure between groups.
Findings We analysed nine randomised trials comparing treatments in 62 605
hypertensive patients. Compared with old drugs (diuretics and beta -blocker
s), calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors o
ffered similar overall cardiovascular protection, but calcium-channel block
ers provided more reduction in the risk of stroke (13.5%, 95% Cl 1.3-24.2,
p=0.03) and less reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction (19.2%, 3.5
-37.3, p=0.01). Heterogeneity was significant between trials because of hig
h risk of cardiovascular events on doxazosin in one trial, and high risk of
stroke on captopril in another; but systolic pressure differed between gro
ups in these two trials by 2-3 mm Hg. Similar systolic differences occurred
in a trial of diltiazem versus old drugs, and in three trials of convertin
g-enzyme inhibitor against placebo in high-risk patients. Meta-regression a
cross 27 trials (136 124 patients) showed that odds ratios could be explain
ed by achieved differences in systolic pressure.
Interpretation Our findings emphasise that blood pressure control is import
ant. All antihypertensive drugs have similar long-term efficacy and safety.
Calcium-channel blockers might be especially effective in stroke preventio
n. We did not find that converting-enzyme inhibitors or a-blockers affect c
ardiovascular prognosis beyond their antihypertensive effects.