This study analyzed 271 actual police cases in order to address several pre
valent issues in the eyewitness literature. Suspect identification (SI) rat
es were obtained for 289 photographic lineups, 258 field showups, 58 live l
ineups, and 66 lineup identifications preceded by earlier identifications.
SI rates were assessed for 3 levels of extrinsic evidence: no extrinsic evi
dence, evidence of minimal probative value, and evidence of substantial pro
bative value. The SI rates for the photographic lineups were assessed as a
function of delay, same vs. cross-race conditions, witness type, and weapon
presence. SI rates declined significantly over time; SI rates were signifi
cantly greater for the same-race condition. Sl rates were much greater for
field showups than photographic lineups, 76% vs. 48%. The SI rates for the
field showups did not vary as a function of eyewitness conditions. The rela
tion between confidence and suspect/foil identifications for the live lineu
ps was significant and moderately high. The utility of archival identificat
ion studies for eyewitness testimony research is discussed.