Survival advantage for carboplatin substituting cisplatin in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C for stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a randomized phase III study
S. Jelic et al., Survival advantage for carboplatin substituting cisplatin in combination with vindesine and mitomycin C for stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: a randomized phase III study, LUNG CANC, 34(1), 2001, pp. 1-13
This communication represents the definitive report of a randomized phase I
II study comparing cisplatin and carboplatin, in combination with vindesine
and mitomycin C in stage IIIB and IV squamous-cell bronchogenic carcinoma.
A total of 221 patients entered the study and were randomized into two arm
s. Of these, 114 patients (109 evaluable for activity) were randomized to a
rm A, receiving cisplatin 120 mg/m(2), mitomycin C 8 mg/m(2) and vindesine
3 mg/m(2) per cycle; 107 patients (101 evaluable for activity) were randomi
zed to arm B receiving carboplatin 500 mg/m(2) with the same doses of mitom
ycin C and vindesine per cycle. Patients with progressive disease (PD) were
excluded from the study after the 2nd cycle, and those with stable disease
(SID), partial response (PR) and complete response (CR) received six cycle
s of chemotherapy (or less in case of early progression). Patients were str
atified according to the clinical stage (IIIB vs. IV), performance status (
0 + 1 vs. 2 + 3) and tumor histological grade (I + II vs. III). In the cisp
latin arm two patients (1.9%) achieved a CR, 38 (34.9%) a PR, 45 (41.2%) a
SID and 24 (22.0%) had PD; the overall response rate was 40/109 (36.8%). In
the carboplatin arm five patients (5.0%) achieved a CR, 31 (30.7%) a PR, 4
0 (39.6%) a SD, and 25 (24.7%) had PD; the overall response rate was 36/101
(35.7%). No statistically significant difference in response rate was pres
ent between the two arms, and the response rate was not influenced by perfo
rmance status, histological grade or clinical stage. The Kaplan-Meyers curv
es displayed a significant advantage both for time to progression (P=0.005)
and overall survival (P=0.008) for patients in the carboplatin arm. The ad
vantage for patients receiving carboplatin instead of cisplatin appeared ev
ident in univariate setting for patients with a good performance status and
clinical stage IV, and occurred irrespectively of tumor histological grade
; response duration and survival of responders was identical in the two arm
s. Patients achieving a stable disease survived longer in the carboplatin t
han in the cisplatin arm (P=0.012). Thus, substitution of cisplatin by carb
oplatin in the combination chemotherapy regimen, although more hematologica
lly toxic (but less emetogenic) resulted in a similar response rate, but a
significantly longer time to progression and overall survival. (C) 2001 Els
evier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.