Intensity-modulated beam profiles are generated by an inverse planning or o
ptimization algorithm, a process that, being computationally complex and in
tensive, is inherently susceptible to noise and numerical artifacts. These
artifacts make delivery of the beams more difficult, oftentimes for little,
if any, observable improvement in the dose distributions. In this work we
examine two approaches for smoothing the beam profiles. The first approach
is to smooth the beam profiles subsequent to each iteration in the optimiza
tion process (method A). The second approach is to include a term within th
e objective function that specifies the smoothness of the profiles as an op
timization criterion (method B). The two methods were applied to a phantom
study as well as three clinical sites: paraspinal, nasopharynx, and prostat
e. For the paraspinal and nasopharynx cases, which have critical organs wit
h low tolerance doses in close proximity, method B produced sharper dose gr
adients, better target dose homogeneity, and more critical organ sparing. I
n the less demanding prostate case, the two methods give similar results. I
n addition, method B is more efficient during optimization, requiring fewer
iterations, but less efficient during DMLC delivery, requiring a longer be
am-on time. (C) 2001 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.