Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy

Citation
Ju. Adelman et al., Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy, NEUROLOGY, 57(8), 2001, pp. 1377-1383
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROLOGY
ISSN journal
00283878 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1377 - 1383
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3878(20011023)57:8<1377:CORAOT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral rizatriptan 10 mg with oral dose s of sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measur es. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from five randomized, placebo-c ontrolled, double-masked clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan was dire ctly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 772), 50 mg (n = 1116), 25 mg (n = 1183), naratriptan 2.5 mg (n = 413), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (n = 5 80) for the acute treatment of a moderate or severe migraine attack. Outcom e measures: Percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours, symptom-free at 2 hours (no pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, vomiting, or functional d isability), 24-hour sustained pain-free (no headache at 2 hours, no recurre nce, and no additional antimigraine medications for 24 hours). Results: Mor e patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were pain-free at 2 hours than were pat ients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (40% vs 33%, p = 0.019), sumatriptan 50 mg (40% vs 35%, p = 0.009), sumatriptan 25 mg (38% vs 27%, p < 0.001), naratri ptan 2.5 mg (45% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (43% vs 36%, p = 0.041). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were symptom-free at 2 ho urs than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (31% vs 22%, p = 0.002), s umatriptan 50 mg (33% vs 28%, p = 0.003), sumatriptan 25 mg (33% vs 24%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (30% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (31% vs 24%, p = 0.042). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg had a 24 -hour sustained pain-free response than did patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (27% vs 23%, p = 0.112), sumatriptan 50 mg (30% vs 26%, p = 0.015), sum atriptan 25 mg (27% vs 20%, p = 0.005), naratriptan 2.5 mg (29% Vs 17%, p = 0.004), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (32% vs 24%, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Oral rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan, naratriptan, an d zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures of pain-free response at 2 hou rs; symptom-free response at 2 hours, and 24-hour sustained pain-free respo nse.