Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral rizatriptan 10 mg with oral dose
s of sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measur
es. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from five randomized, placebo-c
ontrolled, double-masked clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan was dire
ctly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 772), 50 mg (n = 1116), 25
mg (n = 1183), naratriptan 2.5 mg (n = 413), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (n = 5
80) for the acute treatment of a moderate or severe migraine attack. Outcom
e measures: Percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours, symptom-free at 2
hours (no pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, vomiting, or functional d
isability), 24-hour sustained pain-free (no headache at 2 hours, no recurre
nce, and no additional antimigraine medications for 24 hours). Results: Mor
e patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were pain-free at 2 hours than were pat
ients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (40% vs 33%, p = 0.019), sumatriptan 50 mg
(40% vs 35%, p = 0.009), sumatriptan 25 mg (38% vs 27%, p < 0.001), naratri
ptan 2.5 mg (45% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (43% vs 36%, p
= 0.041). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were symptom-free at 2 ho
urs than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (31% vs 22%, p = 0.002), s
umatriptan 50 mg (33% vs 28%, p = 0.003), sumatriptan 25 mg (33% vs 24%, p
< 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (30% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5
mg (31% vs 24%, p = 0.042). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg had a 24
-hour sustained pain-free response than did patients taking sumatriptan 100
mg (27% vs 23%, p = 0.112), sumatriptan 50 mg (30% vs 26%, p = 0.015), sum
atriptan 25 mg (27% vs 20%, p = 0.005), naratriptan 2.5 mg (29% Vs 17%, p =
0.004), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (32% vs 24%, p = 0.013). Conclusion: Oral
rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan, naratriptan, an
d zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures of pain-free response at 2 hou
rs; symptom-free response at 2 hours, and 24-hour sustained pain-free respo
nse.