Objective: The waist circumference is widely viewed as a simple but effecti
ve measure for assessing obesity-related health risks, whereas measurement
of the hip circumference is not currently prioritized. This study examines
health risks associated specifically with hip circumference in a cohort of
Swedish women, to determine whether information may be lost by excluding th
e hip circumference from health surveys.
Research Methods and Procedures: The subjects described in this report cons
titute a population-based sample of 38- to 60-year-old women who underwent
anthropometric examinations in 1968. The 24-year incidence rates have been
ascertained for myocardial infarction, combined cardiovascular diseases, an
d diabetes. All-cause, cardiovascular, and myocardial infarction mortality
also were evaluated.
Results: Hip circumference was a significant independent inverse risk estim
ator for all endpoints studied. Using Cox regression with adjustment for ag
e, smoking, body mass index, and waist circumference, the remaining variabi
lity associated with larger hips was associated with significantly fewer ad
verse health outcomes. The hip circumference became statistically informati
ve after body mass index adjustment. The strongest protective associations
were observed for cardiovascular disease and diabetes endpoints, although s
ignificant trends were also seen for total mortality. Considering hip and w
aist simultaneously, the strength of the inverse association for large hips
generally exceeded the positive association for waist.
Discussion: Recent interest in the waist circumference as an effective scre
ening tool has taken the focus off of the hip circumference. The present re
sults suggest that collection of hip measurements should not be discontinue
d in assessment of obesity-related risk status and health promotion.