Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury

Citation
Vg. Bird et al., Reflexes and somatic responses as predictors of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injury, SPINAL CORD, 39(10), 2001, pp. 514-519
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINAL CORD
ISSN journal
13624393 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
514 - 519
Database
ISI
SICI code
1362-4393(200110)39:10<514:RASRAP>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To identify factors in addition to level of injury (LOI) that ma y predict ejaculation 7 by penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) in spinal cor d injured mates. Setting: Major urban medical school and teaching hospital. Materials and methods: Presence of a bulbocavernosus response (BCR) and a h ip flexor response (HR) before PVS (n = 123 patients), and somatic response s during PVS (n = 204 trials performed on a subset of 44 patients) were eva luated for their frequency of occurrence on trials with and without ejacula tion. Results: Overall ejaculation success rates for cervical. T1 - T6. and T7 - T12 LOI were 71%. 73%, and 35%, respectively. Eighty per cent of patients w ho were positive for both BCR and FIR ejaculated with PVS, while only 8% of patients who were negative for both BCR and HR ejaculated with PVS. For ce rvical injuries, BCR and HR were no more predictive of ejaculation by PVS t han LOI alone. T1 - T6 patients were more likely to ejaculate when at least one reflex was present. T7 - T12 patients with no BCR were unlikely to eja culate by PVS. Except for abdominal contractions. somatic responses were no t present in the majority of PVS trials. When they were present, however. t hey occurred in a high percentage of ejaculation trials: withdrawal respons e (hip flexion. knee flexion and thigh adduction) (90%), piloerection (84%) , extremity spasms (83%), thigh abduction (80%), and thigh adduction (72%). Conclusion: We recommend that patients with cervical injuries initially und ergo PVS. Patients with T1 - T6 LOI with at least one reflex present, and p atients with T7 - T12 LOI with both reflexes, or only BCR present, may unde rgo PVS. Certain somatic/autonomic responses, when seen, may help in decidi ng whether to continue with a given trial, or give a repeat trial, of PVS. Sponsorship: The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and the State of Florida S pecific Appropriations.