This study used computer models to investigate two different strategies for
assessing risk in the development of age-based life-tables from studbook d
ata sets. One methodology is similar to that currently employed in American
Zoo and Aquarium Association population management, which prorates animals
at risk within age-classes. The other follows the method used in human lif
e-tables that assumes animals are at risk for the entire age-class. This st
udy concludes that prorating risk may invalidate population growth projecti
ons by significantly and unequally over-estimating fecundity and mortality
rates. This effect is most pronounced in species that have distinct breedin
g seasons (birth pulse populations), seasonal mortality, and small data set
s. Recommendations include using a non-prorated methodology, tabulating lif
e-tables using only completely known age-class data, and combining populati
on parameters for emigrations, releases, and deaths for population growth p
rojections. Zoo Biol 20:279-291, 2001. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.