The information content of indicators in intercropping research

Citation
J. Connolly et al., The information content of indicators in intercropping research, AGR ECO ENV, 87(2), 2001, pp. 191-207
Citations number
97
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
ISSN journal
01678809 → ACNP
Volume
87
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
191 - 207
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8809(200111)87:2<191:TICOII>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
This paper examines indicators and methods currently used in intercropping research. A review of papers in Experimental Agriculture and Journal of Agr icultural Science (Cambridge) in the years 1990-1999 gave 50 papers on inte rcropping from which 72 experiments were examined. The objectives of experi ments, apart from virtually all being concerned with crop yield under inter cropping, were dominated by interest in management methods affecting interc ropping benefit, with concerns about the economic analysis of intercropping benefits and of the sustainability of tested systems and in the mechanisms underlying intercropping effects. Concerns about stability and sustainabil ity were not as central as might have been expected. Few experiments were m ainly concerned with exploring the way in which species interact in mixture as an explanation of intercropping effects (e.g. through manipulation of t he timing of planting or examination of root and shoot competition). Close to half the studies used the additive series design with pairwise, replacem ent series and response model designs each accounting for about 17% of case s. Only two studies measured at the level of the individual plant and only two studies included initial indicators of plant size or other biological s tarting point. Analysis of the combination of experimental design used, the measurements taken and the statistical analysis performed showed that whil e most experiments could provide some valid indicators and thus inferences on crop yields few of them could be used to address questions on the inter- and intraspecific interactions leading to the intercropping outcomes. The duration of experiments was 1 year for about half of experiments involving annual species only and about one-third of experiments involving at least o ne perennial species. The overall conclusion is that considerable care need s to taken to ensure that the indicators and experimental methods used are appropriate to the development and testing of sustainable systems based on intercropping. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.