Fs. Pereles et al., Usefulness of segmented TrueFISP cardiac pulse sequence in evaluation of congenital and acquired adult cardiac abnormalities, AM J ROENTG, 177(5), 2001, pp. 1155-1160
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare ultrashort TR, segmented
trueFISP (fast imaging with steady-state precession) cine MR imaging with
segmented FLASH (fast low-angle shot) cine NM imaging for the detection and
characterization of congenital and acquired adult cardiac abnormalities.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-five patients with known or clinically suspect
ed cardiac abnormalities were imaged on a 1.5-T scanner. Valve plane movies
were obtained in patients with suspected valve morphology or function abno
rmalities or whose horizontal long-axis images showed jets, For each patien
t, three radiologists independently compared corresponding matched cine FLA
SH and trueFISP movies for image quality in evaluating anatomy and function
of the great vessels and heart. Image quality was rated on a five-point sc
ale, and data were analyzed using both a Wilcoxon's signed rank test and a
repeated-measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS. Image quality ratings of trueFISP and FLASH showed a statistically
significant difference (F = 58.67 df = 1, 72; p < 0.0001), with the averag
e rating for the trueFISP images being significantly higher (mean rating, 4
.1 +/- 0.92) than that for the FLASH images (mean, 3.0 +/- 1.0). However, v
alve architecture in the aortic valves appeared to be better visualized and
was more easily measured in valve plane images with FLASH. No statisticall
y significant differences among the ratings of the interpreters (F = 0.018;
df = 2, 72; p = 0.9821) were evident, and, therefore, no suggestion of bia
s was indicated (F = 0.775; df = 1, 2; p = 0.4645). TrueFISP yielded the co
rrect diagnosis prospectively in 13 (100%) of 13 patients, whereas FLASH yi
elded the correct diagnosis in 12 (92%) of 13 patients.
CONCLUSION. TrueFISP images depict morphologic and functional abnormalities
with greater clarity and provide greater diagnostic confidence than FLASH
images-and in a fraction of the time. A specific exception is in the assess
ment of valve leaflet architecture and cross-sectional area calculation (i.
e., bicuspid aortic valves); in these evaluations, FLASH maintains a comple
mentary diagnostic imaging role.