Problems in the development and validation of questionnaire-based screening instruments for ascertaining cases with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis -The Framingham Study

Citation
M. Lavalley et al., Problems in the development and validation of questionnaire-based screening instruments for ascertaining cases with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis -The Framingham Study, ARTH RHEUM, 44(5), 2001, pp. 1105-1113
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
ISSN journal
00043591 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1105 - 1113
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-3591(200105)44:5<1105:PITDAV>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Objective. To determine if screening for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (O A) for clinical trials and epidemiologic studies could be satisfactorily do ne without performing knee radiographs and to develop efficient screening i nstruments for symptomatic knee OA based on self-reported symptoms and func tional limitations. Methods. We administered a mailed questionnaire containing many different q uestions on knee symptoms and functional limitations to 1,921 participants of the Framingham Study who had previously been screened for symptomatic OA with a history and knee radiographs. Recursive partitioning methods (using the Classification and Regression Trees [CART] program) were used to creat e a set of screening instruments for symptomatic knee OA, which was defined as knee symptoms on most days and radiographic evidence of OA. Three scree ning instruments were developed to maximize the sensitivity, specificity, a nd efficiency. Results. The sensitive instrument had 84% sensitivity and 73% specificity. The specific instrument had 46% sensitivity and 94% specificity. The effici ent instrument had 56% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Sensitivity was low er and specificity was higher when these instruments were used to screen fo r radiographic OA. All instruments had higher sensitivity but lower specifi city when used for older subjects (age >60) with greater disease prevalence . However, using any of these instruments as a single-step screening mechan ism resulted in considerable misclassification. Conclusion. We conclude that none of these instruments has adequate diagnos tic test performance to serve as a single-step evaluation of the presence o r absence of symptomatic knee OA.