M. Lecha, Amorolfine and itraconazole combination for severe toenail onychomycosis; results of an open randomized trial in Spain, BR J DERM, 145, 2001, pp. 21-26
Objective In an open, randomized, clinical study of toenail onychomycosis w
ith matrix area involvement, two alternative regimens of topical amorolfine
/oral itraconazole therapy were compared with itraconazole monotherapy.
Patients/Methods A total of 131 patients were randomized to treatment. Pati
ents in the combination groups were treated with amorolfine 5% nail lacquer
(Loceryl(R), Galderma Laboratories) once weekly for 24 weeks and 200 mg it
raconazole once daily for 6 weeks (Group AI-6) or 12 weeks (Group AI-12). A
control group received itraconazole monotherapy for 12 weeks (Group I-12).
Strict inclusion criteria specified that subjects had to have onychomycosi
s of the toenails with matrix area involvement and/or > 80% total nail surf
ace involvement. Mycological evaluations using both microscopic examination
and culture of nail samples were performed at weeks 12 and 24. A stringent
assessment of outcome at study end combined the results of mycological and
clinical outcomes into a global cure rate. Safety was also assessed.
Results At week 12, mycological cure was attained in 42 of 45 patients (93.
3%) in group AI-6, 29 of 35 patients (82.9%) in group AI-12, and 14 of 34 p
atients in group I-12. The difference between both combination groups and t
he control group were significant (P < 0.001). The global cure rate at week
24 was 83.7% (36 patients) in group AI-6, 93.9'% (31 patients) in group AI
-12, and 68.8% (22 patients) in group I-12. The difference between the AI-1
2 group and itraconazole monotherapy was significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions These results indicate that amorolfine combination therapy repr
esents an improved treatment strategy for patients with severe onychomycosi
s.