Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

Citation
Jd. Hainsworth et al., Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma - Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network, CANCER, 92(9), 2001, pp. 2391-2398
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
92
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2391 - 2398
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(20011101)92:9<2391:WDWEGO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The current study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, to xicity, and efficacy of weekly docetaxel when paired with either gemcitabin e or vinorelbine as the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non small cell lung carcinoma. METHODS. Patients with progressive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after one p revious chemotherapeutic regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group per formance status of 0-2, and measurable lesions were eligible for treatment in these Phase II trials. Patients who had not received gemcitabine previou sly were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), both of which were administered intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1, 8, and 15 o f a 28-day cycle. if the patients had received gemcitabine as part of first -line therapy, they were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and vinorelbin e, 20 mg/m(2) i.v., on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were r eevaluated after two courses of treatment, and responding patients continue d treatment for six courses or until disease progression. RESULTS. Forty patients were treated with a combination of docetaxel and ge mcitabine, and 23 patients received docetaxel and vinorelbine. The docetaxe l/gemcitabine combination was reasonably well tolerated, with moderate myel osuppression and a few nonhematologic toxicities reported. The objective re sponse rate was 10%, with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. The docetaxel/vino relbine combination was found to be poorly tolerated, with Grade 3/4 leukop enia reported in 71% of patients and neutropenic fever reported in 70% of p atients despite frequent dose reductions and omission of the Day 15 doses. Enrollment onto this regimen was stopped prematurely due to toxicity, and a fter no major responses were observed in the first 20 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS. The combination of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine appears to be feasible and relatively well tolerated as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, whereas a weekly combination o f docetaxel and vinorelbine did not appear to be tolerable at the doses and schedule used in the current study. Neither regimen showed a level of acti vity that suggested any advantage compared with the results obtained with s ingle-agent docetaxel in this setting. (C) 2001 American Cancer Society.