Background Damage of the peripheral nervous system is particularly frequent
in diabetes mellitus (DM), but somatic cranial neuropathies usually presen
ting as mononeuropathies are rare. Oculomotor and facial nerves are among t
he most commonly affected, whereas the Vth, IXth and Xth cranial nerves are
less often affected. While existing neurophysiological tests in the subcli
nical diagnosis of damage to the peripheral nerve in diabetic patients have
advanced, the same does not hold true for the subclinical diagnosis of the
central nervous system (CNS). Electrophysiological studies such as the bli
nk reflex was shown to be an effective method for revealing subclinical inv
olvement of cranial nerves in generalised neuropathies. The aim of the pres
ent study was to evaluate the efficacy of blink reflex as a method for obta
ining early diagnosis of cranial nerve involvement in diabetic patients fre
quently affected with peripheral neuropathy.
Methods, Twenty diabetic patients with electrophysiologically confirmed neu
ropathy were included in the present study for the evaluation of blink refl
ex. Patients with earlier cranial nerve involvement were excluded.
Results Abnormal blink reflex responses were found in 55% of patients studi
ed. R2Y and R2C latencies in diabetic patients were prolonged relative to c
ontrols (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). However R1 values in diabetic
patients did not differ significantly from those of normal controls (p < 0.
5). R2Y, and R2C prolongation showed a positive correlation with the durati
on of disease (p=0.015 and p=0.009, respectively). However the same correla
tion could not be found with RI values. No correlations were found between
R1, R2Y, R2C values and HbA(1c) nor between R1, R2Y, R2C values and patient
s' age.
Conclusion We suggest that blink reflex testing is a useful method for obta
ining early diagnosis of cranial nerve compromise in diabetic patients, who
do not show any clinical symptoms or signs of CNS involvement. Copyright (
C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.