Multicenter evaluation of an automated system using selected bacteria thatharbor challenging and clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics
R. Leclercq et al., Multicenter evaluation of an automated system using selected bacteria thatharbor challenging and clinically relevant mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics, EUR J CL M, 20(9), 2001, pp. 626-635
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES
A multicenter study was carried out to evaluate the performance of a new co
mmercial automated system in comparison with that of the reference agar dil
ution method. Ten clinical microbiology laboratories tested a collection of
61 strains of grain-negative bacilli (49 Enterobacteriaceae and 12 Pseudom
onas aeruginosa), and 6 other laboratories tested a collection of 55 strain
s of gram-positive cocci (10 enterococci and 45 staphylococci) against 10-2
0 antimicrobial agents. The strains were selected on the basis that they ha
rbored challenging and characterized mechanisms of resistance. In compariso
n with the agar reference method, the automated system gave an overall esse
ntial agreement (+/-1 dilution) of 94.5%, 93.5%, and 97% for the gramnegati
ve bacilli, enterococci. and staphylococci, respectively. According to the
interpretive standards of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory St
andards, the category agreement ranged from 96 to 96.4% for the three sets
of organisms. The accuracy of the automated system, as determined by the ka
ppa test, ranged from 0.80 to 0.88, reflecting an almost perfect agreement
with the reference technique. Very major. major, and minor errors obtained
with the automated system were 0.3%. 2.9%, and 6.6% for gram-negative bacil
li, 3.4%, 0%, and 5% for enterococci. and 1%, 1.6%, and 2.7% for staphyloco
cci. respectively. The high rate of very major errors in enterococci was mo
stly due to a single strain of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium, wh
ich was found susceptible to several antibiotics in a majority of participa
nt laboratories. The use of a heavy inoculum and of a broth test medium by
the automated system might account for a better expression of certain resis
tance mechanisms, including beta -lactamases, as compared to the agar dilut
ion reference method. The interlaboratory reproducibility was acceptable. a
s shown by the narrow dispersion of MICs and by the results of quality cont
rol.