Society, the workplace and the family are changing. Despite increasing weal
th, these changes appear to be accompanied by increasing anxiety and depres
sion. Functional bowel disorders are associated with increased psychologica
l morbidity, and the treatment of functional disorders needs to take these
social and psychological factors into account. In the medical setting, ther
efore, the "therapeutic team" needs to be restructured to encompass a broad
er spectrum of skills and resources than currently exists in most units. An
increase in understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms is likely to be
helpful for patients who are not amenable to, or have failed, first line p
sychologically based, or simple drug, therapies. For example, in reflux dis
ease, the elucidation of the mechanism underlying spontaneous sphincter rel
axations may lead to precise end organ targeting-this can be at efferent or
afferent ends of the pathways. Recent elucidation of involvement of GABA a
nd NO have highlighted possible neurochemical targets. In constipation 5-HT
4 agonists have lead to specific activation of motor events responsible for
gut transport. For diarrhoea, multiple targets are available, e.g. opioid
agonists, somatostatin analogues. Modulation of pain represents a more diff
icult task. Decreasing visceral sensitivity, and alteration of cerebral or
spinal mediation of pain, remain unproven strategies. Greater understanding
of the mechanisms by which chronic stress influence gut function and sympt
oms is likely to lead to new therapeutic approaches. This should include an
understanding of the link between psychological morbidity and altered auto
nomic effector function. It should help in understanding why symptoms local
ise to different body systems, such as the gut or gynaecological viscera. O
ther priorities in this area are to improve clinical trial design, and to i
mprove symptom and quality of life measures of the efficacy of treatments.