The concept of transculturality suggests a new conceptualization of culture
differing from classical monocultures and the more recent conceptions of i
nterculturality and multiculturality. The traditional description of cultur
es as islands or spheres is descriptively wrong, because cultures today are
characterized internally by a pluralization of identities, and externally
by border-crossing contours. Furthermore, this traditional concept, which e
mphasizes homogeneity and delineation, is normatively dangerous in structur
ally suppressing differences and encouraging separatism and violent conflic
ts. The concepts of interculturality and multiculturalism tackle some of th
ese ills, but their basic flaw remains the presupposition of cultures as ho
mogeneous islands or enclosed spheres. The concept of transculturality seek
s conversely to articulate today's cultural constitution, one characterized
by intertwinement, and to elicit the requisite conceptional and normative
consequences. Furthermore, transculturality is found at the individual micr
olevel too: most of us are cultural hybrids. Transculturality aims for cult
ures with the ability to link and undergo transition whilst avoiding the th
reat of homogenization or uniformization. Cultural diversity arises in a ne
w mode as a transcultural blend rather than a juxtaposition of clearly deli
neated cultures. While it is currently assumed that we are going global and
are, by doing this, uniformizing more and more, the concept of transcultur
ality questions this line of thinking. The tendency towards transculturalit
y does not mean that our cultural formation is becoming the same all over t
he world. On the contrary, processes of globalization and becoming transcul
tural imply a great variety of differentiation. Transcultural webs woven fr
om the same sources can differ greatly and be quite specific and even indiv
idualistic. The concept of transculturality counters the one-sidedness of b
oth globalization and particularization diagnoses.